How Does a Sudden, Large Price Increase in One Token in a Liquidity Pool Trigger Arbitrage?

A price increase in Token A makes the pool's ratio (Token A / Token B) cheaper than the external market price. Arbitrageurs buy the cheaper Token A from the pool using Token B, which reduces the supply of A and increases the supply of B in the pool.

This action drives the pool's internal price of A up until it matches the external price, thus rebalancing the ratio and realizing the impermanent loss for the liquidity provider.

How Do Cash-and-Carry Arbitrageurs Profit from Contango?
How Do Arbitrageurs Profit from the Price Imbalance in a Liquidity Pool?
How Does High Trading Volume in a Pool Relate to the Frequency of Arbitrage and Impermanent Loss Realization?
In the Context of This Formula, What Role Does Arbitrage Play in Enforcing the Price Ratio ‘K’?
Why Is the Price Difference between the Pool and External Exchanges Necessary for Arbitrage to Occur?
How Does Transaction Slippage Affect the Profitability of Arbitrage in a Liquidity Pool?
Why Is a Sudden, Large Price Change More Detrimental than a Gradual One for Impermanent Loss?
How Do Rebalancing Strategies for Concentrated Liquidity Positions Differ from Those for Traditional AMMs?