How Does a Token’s “Burning” Mechanism Affect Its Utility or Security Classification?

A token burning mechanism, where tokens are permanently removed from circulation, can affect both utility and security classification depending on the reason for the burn. If the burn is tied to usage fees, it reinforces the utility function.

However, if the burn is implemented to reduce supply and increase the value of the remaining tokens for investors, it can strengthen the "expectation of profit" prong of the Howey Test. Regulators will examine the economic substance and the stated purpose of the burn.

How Are Token Burning Mechanisms Used to Manage Treasury Token Supply?
How Does the “Expectation of Profit” Element Relate to Token Governance Rights?
Can a Token with Immediate Utility Still Satisfy the Expectation of Profit Prong?
How Do Tokenomics Influence the Classification of a Token as Utility or Security?
What Role Does the Token’s “Consumptive Use” Play in Avoiding Howey Classification?
How Can a High Transaction Fee Burn Impact Network Usage?
What Is the Economic Effect of ‘Burning’ the Base Fee?
How Does the Concept of ‘Liquidity Mining’ Boost Stablecoin Usage?

Glossar