How Does Capital Efficiency Differ between a Standard AMM and a Concentrated Liquidity Pool?

Capital efficiency is significantly higher in a concentrated liquidity pool (CLP). In a standard AMM, capital is spread across the entire 0 to infinity price curve, meaning a large portion of the capital is inactive at any given time.

A CLP allows LPs to concentrate their capital into the most active trading range. This means the same amount of capital can facilitate a much larger volume of trades, generating higher fees and thus being more capital efficient than a standard AMM.

How Do Rebalancing Strategies for Concentrated Liquidity Positions, Such as Active Management, Impact Realized Gains or Losses?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools Attempt to Mitigate Impermanent Loss?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools (Like Uniswap V3) Modify the X · Y = K Curve?
What Is the Trade-off between Capital Efficiency and Impermanent Loss Risk in Concentrated Liquidity?
What Is the Main Benefit of Capital Efficiency Achieved by Concentrated Liquidity?
How Does a Concentrated Liquidity Pool Differ in Its Impact on Impermanent Loss?
In Concentrated Liquidity, What Happens to the Capital That Is “Out of Range”?
How Do Single-Sided Staking and Concentrated Liquidity Pools Attempt to Mitigate Impermanent Loss?

Glossar