Skip to main content

How Does Counterparty Risk Differ between Custodial and Non-Custodial Exchanges?

On a custodial exchange, counterparty risk is concentrated on the exchange itself. If the exchange becomes insolvent or suffers a security breach, users can lose their funds because the exchange holds their assets.

For non-custodial exchanges, the risk is shifted from a central entity to smart contracts. While this eliminates the risk of the exchange failing, it introduces smart contract risk, where a bug or exploit in the code could lead to a loss of funds.

Users do not face the risk of the exchange itself being a failing counterparty.

What Risks Does a CCP Itself Concentrate and How Are They Managed?
How Does an RFQ Platform Handle Message Throttling or Rate Limits from Exchanges?
How Does the Security of the Underlying Blockchain Affect the DeFi Platform’s Smart Contract Risk?
How Does ‘Fill Rate’ Specifically Measure Quote Competitiveness on an RFQ Platform?