Skip to main content

How Does Increasing Confirmation Requirements Mitigate Risk?

By increasing the required number of block confirmations for a deposit to be credited, the exchange forces a potential attacker to extend their malicious chain significantly longer than the honest chain. For a double-spend attack to succeed, the attacker would need to maintain 51% control and re-mine many blocks, which becomes exponentially harder with each confirmation.

This increases the cost and time of the attack, making it economically unfeasible.

How Does a Network’s Decentralization Impact Its Security against a 51% Attack?
How Can Exchanges Protect Themselves from Double-Spending Caused by 51% Attacks?
How Do Centralized Exchanges Prevent Double-Spending before Blockchain Confirmation?
What Is “Double-Spending” in the Context of a 51% Attack?