How Does Interacting with a Contract’s Function Constitute Acceptance?

Interacting with a smart contract's function, such as calling a 'swap' or 'mint' function, constitutes acceptance because the user must explicitly sign the transaction with their private key. This cryptographic signature serves as the user's unambiguous assent to the terms (the code's logic) and initiates the automated execution of the contract.

What Is a Replay Attack in the Context of a Signed Cryptocurrency Transaction?
How Does ‘Offer and Acceptance’ Relate to Smart Contract Deployment?
How Does a Transaction’s Inclusion in a Merkle Tree Provide Cryptographic Proof of Its Existence?
Can a Minor’s Crypto Transaction Be Legally Rescinded?
How Does a Transaction Become Visible in the Mempool?
What Are the Technical Challenges in Translating Complex Financial Clauses into Smart Contract Code?
What Is the Difference between Proof of Work and Proof of Stake Consensus Mechanisms?
Can an ‘Unsigned’ Smart Contract Be Legally Binding?

Glossar