How Does “Liquid Staking” Introduce a New Layer of Risk to PoS Security?

Liquid staking introduces a new layer of risk by creating a liquid derivative token (LST) that represents the user's staked asset. This token can be traded or used in DeFi protocols, potentially centralizing control of the underlying staked assets in the hands of a few LST protocols.

If a single liquid staking protocol controls over 51% of the staked tokens, it could theoretically collude to perform a malicious attack without having to acquire the tokens directly, creating a single point of failure and centralization risk.

Can a Single Entity Control All ‘N’ Keys in a Multisig Setup and Still Claim Risk Reduction?
Is It Easier to Perform a 51% Attack on a Proof of Stake or a Proof of Work Network?
What Is the Risk of Having Too Few Signers on a Multisig Wallet?
What Is the Risk of a Single-Source Price Feed Oracle?
How Does a 51% Attack Differ between PoW and PoS Systems?
What Are the Risks Associated with a “Single Point of Failure” in a Decentralized Oracle System?
Is It Possible for a Single Entity to Control the Majority of Staked Assets in a Large PoS Network?
What Are the Trade-Offs of Using Quadratic Voting for Proposal Funding versus Simple Majority Voting?

Glossar