How Does PoS Prevent Centralization despite Validators Needing Large Stakes?

Pure Proof-of-Stake attempts to prevent centralization through mechanisms like randomized validator selection, which limits the power of large stakers in any single round. Furthermore, some PoS systems enforce limits on the maximum stake that can be pooled or use complex reward distribution schemes that favor smaller stakers.

The ability for small holders to delegate their stake to a pool also increases participation and decentralization.

Does the PoA Selection Mechanism Suffer from the “Rich Get Richer” Criticism of PoS?
How Does a PoS Re-Org Affect Staking Rewards for Honest Validators?
What Is the Difference between Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Staking and Liquidity Pool Staking?
How Does ‘Delegated PoS’ Attempt to Address This Centralization Risk?
What Mechanisms Are in Place to Prevent Collusion between Miners and Validators in a Proof-of-Activity System?
How Does Proof of Stake Handle the Risk of Centralization?
What Role Do Derivatives Play in Allowing Non-Validators to Gain Exposure to PoS Staking Rewards?
What Is the Difference between ‘Mining’ and ‘Staking’ in Cryptocurrency?

Glossar