Skip to main content

How Does Proof-of-Stake Inherently Defend against a Sybil Attack?

Proof-of-Stake (PoS) defends against a Sybil attack by tying a validator's influence directly to the amount of cryptocurrency they have staked. To gain a majority influence and launch an attack, an entity would need to acquire over 51 percent of the total staked supply.

The financial cost of acquiring this capital makes a Sybil attack prohibitively expensive, as the attacker cannot simply create numerous free, fake identities to overwhelm the network.

What Is the Difference between a 51 Percent Attack and a Sybil Attack?
What Is a ‘Governance Attack’ and How Can Token Weight Schemes Defend against It?
What Is a “Sybil Attack” and How Does It Differ from a 51% Attack?
How Does the Threat of Slashing Contribute to the “Cost of Attack” on Ethereum?