How Does “Protocol Sink” Utility Contribute to Token Demand?

Protocol sink utility refers to mechanisms that require users to acquire and lock or spend the native token to access core network functions or services. Examples include paying transaction fees, collateralizing a loan, or staking for governance.

By creating necessary and persistent demand for the token, the protocol effectively "sinks" the supply, which contributes positively to its long-term intrinsic value.

What Is the Difference between a Fee-Sharing Token and a Simple Utility Token in a DCF Context?
How Does a Protocol’s Total Value Locked (TVL) Relate to Its Sink Utility?
What Is the Risk of a Token Having Utility Only as a Medium of Exchange?
How Does a Collateral Token Function as a Protocol Sink?
What Is the Primary Function of a Utility Token versus a Security Token?
What Is the Difference between “Utility” and “Value Accrual” for a Token?
How Do Investor Lock-Ups Differ from Team Lock-Ups?
What Is a Common Lock-up Period for a Project’s Core Team Tokens?

Glossar