Skip to main content

How Does the Black-Scholes Model’s Assumption of Constant Volatility Fail to Capture the Volatility Smile?

The Black-Scholes model assumes that the underlying asset's volatility is constant across all strike prices and time to maturities. The existence of the volatility smile, which shows that implied volatility varies systematically with strike price, directly contradicts this assumption.

The model fails because it does not account for the market's perception of "fat tails," or the higher-than-normal probability of extreme price movements.

What Is a ‘Volatility Smile’ and What Does It Suggest about the Black-Scholes Assumption?
In Both Cases, Who Is the Party That Assumes the Risk?
What Is a “Volatility Smile” and What Does It Indicate about the Black-Scholes Model’s Assumptions?
How Does a Margin Model Account for the Jump Risk Inherent in Cryptocurrency Markets?