How Does the Collateralization Ratio Differ between Algorithmic and Fully Backed Stablecoins?

Fully backed stablecoins (like USDC) aim for a 1:1 ratio, meaning $1 of fiat or equivalent collateral for every stablecoin. Algorithmic stablecoins, by design, are either under-collateralized or not collateralized at all, relying purely on market mechanisms.

This lack of physical backing is the core vulnerability that makes them susceptible to death spirals when confidence fails.

Is a Crypto-Backed Stablecoin More Decentralized than an Algorithmic One?
What Is the Risk Profile of an Algorithmic Stablecoin versus a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin?
What Is a “Stablecoin,” and What Are the Three Main Types of Stablecoin Collateralization Mechanisms?
What Is the Difference between a ‘Fiat-Backed’ and an ‘Algorithmic’ Stablecoin?
What Is the Collateralization Ratio for a Fully-Backed Wrapped Asset?
What Is the Difference between Fiat-Backed and Algorithmic Stablecoins in Terms of Peg Risk for Derivatives?
What Are the Differences between Asset-Backed and Algorithmic Stablecoins?
How Do Asset-Backed Tokens Differ from Algorithmic Stablecoins?

Glossar