How Does the Compiler Handle Assembly Code regarding Integer Checks?

The Solidity compiler's automatic integer overflow and underflow checks are only applied to the high-level Solidity code. When a developer uses inline assembly (Yul), they are directly writing EVM opcodes, and the compiler assumes the developer knows what they are doing.

Therefore, the compiler does not insert any automatic safety checks for arithmetic operations within assembly blocks. Developers must manually implement their own checks or ensure the logic is safe, making assembly code a high-risk area for integer vulnerabilities.

What Is the Role of the Solidity Compiler in Mitigating Integer Vulnerabilities?
What Is the Performance Impact of the Compiler’s Built-in Checks?
Why Is SafeMath Less Necessary in Solidity 0.8.0 and Later?
How Does ‘Off-Chain Governance’ Differ from On-Chain Governance?
How Are Smart Contracts Audited to Identify and Mitigate Security Risks?
How Does the SEC’s “Safe Harbor” Proposal Relate to the Howey Test?
How Did the DAO Hack Relate to Integer Overflow?
What Is the Purpose of the Checksum Added to a Bitcoin Address?

Glossar