How Does the “Cover 2” Standard Relate to CCP Default Fund Sizing?

The "Cover 2" standard requires a CCP to maintain enough pre-funded financial resources, including its own capital and the default fund, to cover the losses resulting from the simultaneous default of its two largest clearing members and their affiliates under extreme but plausible market conditions. This is a critical measure of a CCP's resilience.

How Do CCPs Use Stress Testing to Determine the Appropriate Size of Their Default Fund?
In What Scenarios Might a CCP Be Forced to “Call Back” Default Fund Contributions from Members?
How Does the Default Waterfall of a CCP Protect Its Non-Defaulting Members?
Can a Clearing Member Be Assessed for Losses beyond Their Pre-Funded Default Fund Contribution?
What Is a ‘Guarantee Fund’ and How Is It Funded by Clearing House Members?
How Is the Risk of Correlated Defaults Factored into the Total Default Fund Size?
What Is the “Waterfall” Structure of a CCP’s Financial Resources?
How Do Regulatory Stress Tests Address the Systemic Risk of Cross-Margining?

Glossar