Skip to main content

How Does the Energy Consumption of Proof-of-Work Compare to Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanisms?

Proof-of-Work (PoW) consumes vastly more energy than Proof-of-Stake (PoS). PoW requires miners to run powerful hardware in a constant, competitive race to solve complex puzzles.

PoS, conversely, uses a mechanism where validators are chosen based on the amount of cryptocurrency they have "staked" as collateral. The computational effort in PoS is minimal, leading to a reduction in energy consumption by an estimated 99.95% compared to PoW.

How Does Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Differ from PoW in Terms of Security and Energy Use?
What Is the Difference between Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS)?
Compare Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanisms
How Does PoW Differ Fundamentally from Proof-of-Stake (PoS)?