Skip to main content

How Does the Lack of a Central Entity Complicate the Enforcement of Anti-Front-Running Measures in DeFi?

The lack of a central entity means there is no single party to hold legally accountable, fine, or compel to implement surveillance systems. Traditional enforcement relies on centralized control over order flow and access to non-public data, which does not exist in DeFi.

Enforcement must shift to targeting the malicious actors (bots, users) and the underlying protocols (through code audits and vulnerability disclosures) rather than a central intermediary.

What Is a “Time-Weighted Average Price” (TWAP) Oracle and Its Anti-Front-Running Benefit?
What Is a ‘Qualified Custodian’ in the Context of Institutional Crypto Assets?
How Does the Lack of a Central Intermediary in a DEX Complicate the Enforcement of Anti-Front-Running Rules?
How Does “Slashing” in PoS Function as a Deterrent against Malicious Actors?