How Does the “Longest Chain Rule” Resolve Discrepancies between Full Nodes?

The longest chain rule, often referred to as the "Nakamoto Consensus," dictates that in the event of a fork or disagreement, full nodes accept the chain with the most cumulative Proof-of-Work (PoW) difficulty, which is usually the longest chain. This mechanism ensures network synchronization and prevents conflicting transaction histories from persisting.

It incentivizes miners to build on the accepted chain.

How Does Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus Modify the Concept of the “Longest Chain”?
How Does a ‘Fork’ Occur in a Blockchain Network?
What Is “Nakamoto Consensus” and How Does PoW Enable It?
What Is the ‘Longest Chain Rule’ and How Does It Resolve Conflicting Blocks?
What Is a “Contentious Hard Fork” versus a “Planned Hard Fork”?
What Is the Difference between Proof of Work and Proof of Stake Consensus Mechanisms?
What Is a 51 Percent Attack and How Does It Exploit the Longest Chain Rule?
What Is the Role of a ‘Nakamoto Consensus’ in Resolving Chain Splits?

Glossar