How Does the ‘Nsequence’ Field Differ in Usage for Opt-in RBF versus Relative Time-Locks?

The 'nSequence' field has two distinct uses: signaling RBF and implementing relative time-locks. For Opt-in RBF, setting 'nSequence' to any value below 0xFFFFFFFE signals replaceability.

For relative time-locks (BIP68/CLTV), a specific bit in the 'nSequence' field is set, and the lower bits encode the time or block height delay. If a transaction uses a relative time-lock, it must also be RBF-enabled (nSequence < 0xFFFFFFFE) to allow for updates to the unconfirmed transaction during the time-lock period.

How Does a Miner Calculate the “Target” Value for a Valid Block Hash?
How Is the Concept of “Implied Volatility” Analogous to Network Congestion in RBF?
Can Smart Contracts Be Used to Automate Options Trading Strategies?
How Do Complex Smart Contracts Affect Gas Usage?
How Do Exchanges Typically Manage the Risk of RBF-enabled Deposits?
What Is the Specific Output Length of a Bitcoin Address in Bits?
In a Commit-Reveal System, What Is the Minimum Time Delay between the Commit and the Reveal?
How Do Smart Contracts Facilitate the Creation and Trading of Financial Derivatives on a Blockchain?