Skip to main content

How Does the Potential for “Governance Attacks” Affect the Value of a Governance Token?

The potential for governance attacks, where a malicious actor gains enough voting power to pass self-serving or destructive proposals, introduces a significant risk premium to the token's valuation. This risk can severely depress the "governance premium" because the power to influence the protocol's future becomes a liability.

Investors must assess the token distribution, the required quorum, and the time lock on proposals as mitigating factors.

How Is Shareholder Liability Different for a DAO Token Holder versus a Traditional Company Stockholder?
How Does the Voting Power of Token Holders Influence MEV Policy?
What Is the Legal Liability of a DAO Token Holder?
What Is the Difference between a 51% Attack and a Sybil Attack?