How Does the Risk of Stale Blocks Influence a Mining Pool’s Payout Structure?

Mining pools often adjust their payout structures to account for the risk and cost of stale blocks. Payout schemes like Pay-Per-Share (PPS) or Full-Pay-Per-Share (FPPS) may factor in the expected stale rate to calculate a fair payout.

A high stale rate reduces the pool's effective revenue, which must be reflected in the payment to miners to maintain the pool's profitability and incentivize efficient mining practices.

Does a Pool’s Minimum Payout Threshold Differ Significantly between PPS and PROP?
How Does a Mining Pool Structure the Distribution of Block Rewards among Its Members?
What Is the Trade-off between Volatility and Expected Return in PPLNS versus PPS?
How Does a Bad Luck Streak in PPLNS Differ in Impact from One in PPS?
What Are the Common Payout Schemes Used by Mining Pools?
How Is the Reward Distributed among Pool Members (Payout Schemes)?
How Does a Pool’s Payout Method (E.g. PPS) Utilize the Share Count?
How Does a Miner Benefit from a Guaranteed Transaction Fee Payout under FPPS?

Glossar