How Does the SEC’s Current Stance on Bitcoin and Ethereum Differ from Other Tokens?

The SEC has publicly stated that Bitcoin is not a security, and its former Director of Corporation Finance indicated that Ethereum's network is sufficiently decentralized that transactions in Ether are not securities transactions. This stance is based on the maturity and decentralization of these networks.

Most other tokens, especially those launched via an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) with a central team, are generally viewed with more scrutiny as potential securities.

What Is the Role of the CFTC versus the SEC in Regulating Crypto Derivatives?
How Does the CFTC’S View on Ether Differ from the SEC’s View?
How Does the SEC’s Stance on Crypto Custody Affect Institutional Adoption?
What Are the Implications of the SEC’s Stance on Unregistered Securities for Crypto Derivatives?
How Does the SEC’s Approach to Decentralized Networks Differ?
What Is the Legal Distinction between a “Utility Token” and a “Security Token” in the US?
How Do Newer AMM Designs, like Uniswap V3, Attempt to Mitigate Sandwich Attacks?
How Has the SEC Applied the Howey Test to Specific Cryptocurrency Cases?

Glossar