How Does the Seigniorage Mechanism Fail during a De-Peg?

The seigniorage mechanism fails when the market loses confidence and the stablecoin price drops significantly below $1. The protocol tries to incentivize burning the stablecoin by issuing the volatile governance token, but the mass selling of the stablecoin causes the governance token’s price to crash faster than the burn can restore the peg.

The value of the issued token becomes insufficient to incentivize arbitrage, and the mechanism breaks down.

How Does the Inflation Rate Affect the Risk of a ‘Death Spiral’ in an Algorithmic Stablecoin?
Is a Buyback-and-Burn Mechanism Superior to a Direct Fee Burn from a Valuation Perspective?
What Happens to the Governance Token’s Value during a Sustained Stablecoin De-Peg?
What Is the Significance of the “Mint and Burn” Mechanism during a Crisis?
What Is a ‘Bank Run’ and How Is It Analogous to a Stablecoin De-Peg Event?
What Is the Role of the Seigniorage Token in a Dual-Token Algorithmic Stablecoin System?
How Can a Token Buyback and Burn Mechanism Create Value for Governance Token Holders?
How Do Decentralized Governance Tokens Incentivize Participation in Mint/burn Decisions?

Glossar