How Does the Size of a Network Affect Its Susceptibility?

A larger network, measured by its total hash rate (PoW) or total staked value (PoS), is significantly less susceptible to a 51% attack. A larger network implies a higher cost to acquire the necessary hardware or capital, making the attack economically infeasible.

The sheer number of independent participants also makes coordination required for an attack much more difficult to achieve secretly.

How Does the Size of an Order Affect Its Susceptibility to Front-Running?
What Is the Difference between a “Permissioned” and “Permissionless” Oracle Network?
How Does a High Cost of Attack Serve as a Security Mechanism for PoW Networks?
What Is a “Barrier Option” and How Does Its Payoff Structure Affect Its Liquidity?
Why Is the ‘Good-Til-Cancelled’ (GTC) Time-in-Force Not Suitable for Managing Short-Term Slippage?
Is a Higher Option Premium Always Correlated with a Higher Minimum RFQ Size?
How Does the ‘Peak Size’ Parameter of an Iceberg Order Influence Its Effectiveness?
How Can the Cost of a 51% Attack Be Calculated?

Glossar