Skip to main content

How Does the Size of the Team’s Token Allocation Impact Investor Perception?

A disproportionately large token allocation to the team or founders can be a significant red flag, suggesting potential centralization of control and a high risk of large-scale selling pressure later. Investors prefer to see a reasonable allocation that aligns with industry standards and a substantial portion reserved for the community, ecosystem development, or public sale.

A smaller, yet fair, allocation combined with a strong vesting schedule is often viewed positively as it signals a commitment not solely based on a massive immediate payout. It reflects the project's decentralization philosophy.

What Are the “Reasonable Steps” an Issuer Must Take to Verify Accredited Investor Status under 506(C)?
How Does a Large Team Allocation Affect Investor Perception?
What Regulatory Exemption Is Commonly Used for Selling a SAFT to US Investors?
How Does the Duration of a Token Lock-up Influence the Project’s Market Perception?