How Does This Pattern Relate to the Concept of Atomic Transactions in Blockchains?

Atomic transactions in blockchains mean that a transaction either completes fully or fails entirely; there are no partial executions. The Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern operates within this atomic context.

While the entire function call is atomic, the order of operations inside it is crucial. A reentrancy attack exploits this internal ordering before the transaction is finalized.

The pattern ensures that the critical state changes are committed internally before any external interaction can hijack the execution flow, thus preserving the intended atomicity of the contract's logic.

Explain the Concept of “Toxic Order Flow” in the Context of Liquidity Provision
How Does a ‘Margin Call’ in Derivatives Compare to the Security Mechanism of ‘Slashing’ in PoS?
How Does the Concept of “Payment for Order Flow” (PFOF) Relate to Market Maker Incentives?
How Does the SEC’s “Safe Harbor” Proposal Relate to the Howey Test?
How Does a “Stop-Limit Order” Combine the Features of a Stop Order and a Limit Order?
How Does a SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) Differ from a SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity)?
How Does a Higher Block Issuance Rate Affect the Time Required to Achieve a Safe Confirmation Depth?
Does ‘Payment for Order Flow’ (PFOF) Apply to Crypto Dark Pools?

Glossar