Skip to main content

How Is the ‘Nothing-at-Stake’ Problem Addressed in Modern PoS Protocols?

The 'nothing-at-stake' problem arises because in a simple PoS system, validators have no cost to vote on multiple competing chain histories after a fork, which prevents the network from converging on a single canonical chain. Modern PoS protocols address this through slashing, where validators who vote for conflicting blocks are penalized.

This economic penalty forces validators to commit to a single chain, solving the issue.

How Is the Concept of ‘Vote Buying’ Addressed in Decentralized Governance Models?
How Does “Slashing” Mitigate the “Nothing at Stake” Problem?
What Is the “Nothing at Stake” Problem Unique to Some Early PoS Designs?
What Is the “Nothing-at-Stake” Problem and How Do PoS Protocols Address It?