How Might New Regulations Affect the Competitive Landscape of Stablecoin Issuers?

New, stringent regulations would likely consolidate the stablecoin market, favoring issuers with deep pockets and established compliance infrastructures (e.g. major financial institutions). Small, less-capitalized issuers, especially those with experimental or opaque reserve models, would struggle to meet the high capital, audit, and disclosure requirements, forcing them out of the market.

This would lead to a reduction in the number of stablecoins, concentrating market share among a few highly regulated and transparent players.

How Do Institutional Investors Typically Adjust Their Exposure to Bitcoin Mining Stocks Post-Halving?
Can a Token Sale Be Fully Compliant without KYC?
How Does Counterparty Risk in Crypto Exchanges Compare to That in Traditional Derivatives Clearing?
Are There Any New or Upcoming Blockchain Projects That Are Planning to Use Proof-of-Activity?
How Might MiCA Affect US-based Stablecoin Issuers Operating in Europe?
How Does the Centralization of Liquidity Affect Market Depth across Crypto Exchanges?
What Are the Capital and Liquidity Standards Imposed on Stablecoin Issuers by New Regulations?
What Are Some Historical Examples of Successful and Failed Algorithmic Stablecoins?

Glossar