Skip to main content

In a Financial Context, How Is the Energy Cost of PoW Sometimes Viewed as a Form of Security Expenditure?

The massive energy consumption in Proof-of-Work (PoW) is often viewed as a necessary expenditure that translates directly into network security. The cost to acquire and run the specialized hardware and the electricity consumed represents the economic barrier to attacking the network.

This expenditure is the price paid to make a 51% attack prohibitively expensive, thus securing the ledger's integrity.

What Is the ‘Cost to Attack’ Metric and Why Is It Crucial for PoW Security?
What Is the Primary Difference in Security Model between PoW and Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS)?
What Are the Security Trade-Offs between PoW’S Energy Expenditure and PoS’s Capital-Locking?
How Does the Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) Model of PoW Differ from the Staking Model of PoS for Security?