In Crypto Options, How Does a Trader’s Quote Competitiveness Affect Their Implied Volatility (IV) Surface?

A trader's competitive quotes, particularly those frequently executed, validate the implied volatility (IV) they are using to price the option. If a trader consistently has the best quotes and high fill rates, it suggests their IV surface accurately reflects market consensus and liquidity.

Poor competitiveness might signal that their IV surface is misaligned, either too high or too low, relative to other market participants.

What Are the Key Inputs a Market Maker Uses to Construct Their Initial IV Surface for a New Crypto Option?
How Do Arbitrage Opportunities Arise from Discrepancies in the IV Surfaces of Different RFQ Providers?
What Is the Typical Fill Rate Benchmark for Competitive Crypto Options Market Makers?
What Specific Algorithms Are Used to Dynamically Adjust Quotes Based on Inventory Delta?
How Does ‘Fill Rate’ Specifically Measure Quote Competitiveness on an RFQ Platform?
How Does Increasing the Number of Steps in the Binomial Model Affect Its Accuracy?
How Does “Win Rate” on an RFQ Platform Relate to a Market Maker’s Pricing Strategy?
In Cryptocurrency Options, How Does the Underlying Asset’s Volatility Impact RFQ Quote Generation?

Glossar