In Options Trading, How Is a Low-Difficulty Coin’s Volatility Potentially Affected by Its 51% Attack Vulnerability?

The vulnerability to a 51% attack introduces a significant, unquantifiable tail risk. This systemic risk of sudden, catastrophic price collapse due to a successful double-spend attack increases the coin's overall volatility, especially its implied volatility.

Option traders will price this risk into their models, leading to higher premiums for both call and put options, reflecting the possibility of extreme price movements in either direction following an attack or a rumor of one.

What Is the Relationship between Implied Volatility and Option Premiums?
How Does a Breach Affect the ‘Risk-Free Rate’ Assumption in Option Pricing?
How Is the “Hot Wallet Vs. Cold Wallet” Split Relevant to Insurance Premiums?
How Does the “Moneyness” of an Option Affect Its Premium Value?
How Does the Implied Volatility Skew Reflect the Market’s Perception of Tail Risk?
What Are the “Greeks” in Options Trading and Which Is Most Affected by Volatility?
How Does the Concept of ‘Gamma Scalping’ Relate to the Concept of ‘Realized Volatility’?
What Is the Relationship between a Coin’s Difficulty and Its Vulnerability to a 51% Attack?

Glossar