Is a Crypto-Backed Stablecoin More Decentralized than an Algorithmic One?

A crypto-backed stablecoin, especially an over-collateralized one like Dai, is generally considered more decentralized than a fiat-backed one, but its decentralization compared to an algorithmic one is debatable. Crypto-backed stablecoins are governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and rely on on-chain smart contracts.

Algorithmic stablecoins aim for pure decentralization by relying only on code and market incentives, but their reliance on a complex, unproven mechanism introduces a different type of systemic risk. The 'decentralization' of a crypto-backed stablecoin is often more robust and proven.

What Are the Potential Impacts on the Broader Cryptocurrency Market If a Major Fiat-Backed Stablecoin Were to Fail?
How Does Over-Collateralization in Crypto-Backed Stablecoins Differ from Fiat-Backed Reserves?
What Is the Main Disadvantage Proof-of-Activity Aims to Solve Compared to Pure Proof-of-Work?
How Do Algorithmic Stablecoins Differ from Fiat-Backed Stablecoins in Terms of Risk?
What Is the Risk Profile of an Algorithmic Stablecoin versus a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin?
What Are the Three Main Types of Stablecoins (Fiat-Backed, Crypto-Backed, Algorithmic)?
How Do Crypto-Backed Stablecoins Differ from Fiat-Backed Stablecoins in Terms of Reserve Management?
What Is the Difference between an Algorithmic Stablecoin and a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin for Treasury Holdings?

Glossar