What Are Common Red Flags to Look for When Reviewing an ICO Whitepaper?

Red flags include vague or overly complex technical descriptions that mask a lack of substance, a heavy reliance on buzzwords without clear implementation, and unrealistic financial projections. Other warnings are an absent or non-transparent team section, poor grammar or unprofessional formatting, and a lack of detail on tokenomics or legal compliance.

Plagiarism or a document that is merely a copy of another project's paper is a severe red flag. Investors should also be wary of documents that focus only on hype and not on the underlying technology.

How Can an Investor Assess the Technical Feasibility Described in a White Paper?
What Is the Role of a Whitepaper in Assessing an ICO’s Legitimacy?
What Is the Significance of the “Use of Funds” Section in an ICO Whitepaper?
How Can an Investor Check for Plagiarism in a Whitepaper?
How Can an Investor Identify Technical Inaccuracies in a Whitepaper?
What Role Does the “Minimum Viable Product” (MVP) Play in Whitepaper Credibility?
How Does a Lack of Technical Expertise in a Team Impact a Derivative-Focused ICO Project?
What Is the Role of Financial Projections in a Whitepaper versus a Business Plan?

Glossar