What Are the Game-Theoretic Implications of Concentrated Liquidity on Overall Market Stability and Liquidity Fragmentation?

Concentrated liquidity introduces complex game-theoretic dynamics. It can lead to liquidity fragmentation, as providers place capital in thousands of unique, narrow price ranges, making overall market depth less predictable.

This can cause higher price volatility when large trades push the price across multiple under-funded tick ranges. It also creates a competitive environment where LPs constantly adjust their narrow ranges to capture the most fees, a practice known as "just-in-time" liquidity, which can further exacerbate volatility and potentially centralize liquidity provision to more sophisticated actors.

How Do Transaction Fees Change Based on Network Congestion and Block Space?
How Does the Lack of Price Discovery in OTC Trades Impact Market Transparency?
What Is a “Concentrated Liquidity” AMM Model and How Does It Improve Capital Efficiency?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools Aim to Improve the Spread on DEXs?
How Did Uniswap V3’s “Concentrated Liquidity” Feature Attempt to Defend against Vampire Attacks?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools Attempt to Mitigate Impermanent Loss?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools Aim to Reduce Slippage?
What Is the Concept of ‘Skin in the Game’ for Founders and Its Impact on Cost of Equity?

Glossar