Skip to main content

What Are the Legal Risks for the Developers or Liquidity Providers of a Non-Compliant DEX?

The legal risks for the developers or liquidity providers of a non-compliant Decentralized Exchange (DEX) are significant and evolving. Regulators may argue that the core developers, who initially wrote the code and control the protocol's upgrade keys, function as an unregistered exchange or a "common enterprise" under the Howey Test.

Liquidity Providers (LPs) may also face risk if their activity is deemed to constitute participation in an illegal gambling operation or an unregistered securities offering. Recent court cases have shown a willingness to target DAOs and their members, blurring the lines of liability.

How Do Liquidity Providers (LPs) in a DEX Earn Fees?
What Are the Risks of a Token Being Deemed a ‘Pre-Functional’ Utility Token?
Can a Reverse ICO Token Be Classified as a Security, and What Test Determines This?
What Are the Legal Consequences of a Token Being Classified as an Unregistered Security?