What Are the Legal Risks for the Developers or Liquidity Providers of a Non-Compliant DEX?

The legal risks for the developers or liquidity providers of a non-compliant Decentralized Exchange (DEX) are significant and evolving. Regulators may argue that the core developers, who initially wrote the code and control the protocol's upgrade keys, function as an unregistered exchange or a "common enterprise" under the Howey Test.

Liquidity Providers (LPs) may also face risk if their activity is deemed to constitute participation in an illegal gambling operation or an unregistered securities offering. Recent court cases have shown a willingness to target DAOs and their members, blurring the lines of liability.

What Is the Legal Risk If a “Utility Token” Is Never Actually Used for Its Stated Utility?
What Are the Implications of the SEC’s Stance on Unregistered Securities for Crypto Derivatives?
What Is the Significance of the ‘Common Enterprise’ Prong of the Howey Test?
What Is Meant by “Common Enterprise” in the Howey Test Context?
What Is a “Cease and Desist” Order in the Context of an ICO?
Is Latency Arbitrage Considered Illegal Market Manipulation by US Regulators?
How Do Liquidity Providers (LPs) in a DEX Earn Fees?
Is Spoofing Illegal in Traditional Financial Markets and Cryptocurrency Markets?

Glossar