What Are the Limitations of Comparing a Layer 1 Blockchain to a DeFi Protocol Using the Same Multiples?
Comparing a Layer 1 (L1) blockchain to a DeFi protocol using the same multiples (e.g. MC/TVL) is limited because their value drivers are fundamentally different.
L1s derive value from security, decentralization, and developer adoption (TVS), while DeFi protocols derive value from financial utility and revenue generation (TVL/Fees). A direct comparison is flawed; L1s should be compared based on metrics like Total Value Secured (TVS) or transaction volume, not just locked liquidity.
Glossar
Financial Utility
Function ⎊ Practical applications for digital assets drive organic demand.
Total Value Secured
Collateralization ⎊ Total Value Secured, within cryptocurrency markets, represents the aggregate value of assets deposited as collateral to secure positions in derivative protocols, functioning as a critical metric for assessing systemic risk and protocol health.
Layer 1 Blockchain
Foundation ⎊ A Layer 1 blockchain represents the foundational network where transactions are processed and permanently recorded.
Limitations
Constraints ⎊ The inherent limitations within cryptocurrency, options trading, and financial derivatives stem from market microstructure, regulatory uncertainty, and technological dependencies, impacting model accuracy and execution feasibility.
Defi Protocol
Structure ⎊ A DeFi Protocol is a set of immutable smart contracts deployed on a blockchain that automates financial services, such as lending, borrowing, or derivatives exchange, without centralized intermediaries.