Skip to main content

What Are the Potential Centralization Risks Associated with Using Developer-Set Checkpoints?

Developer-set checkpoints introduce a centralization risk because they grant the core developers the authority to dictate which chain history is considered valid. If a malicious developer sets a checkpoint to an illegitimate block, the network is forced to accept it, overriding the decentralized consensus.

This reliance on a trusted third party (the developers) undermines the core tenet of a decentralized, trustless system, creating a single point of failure and potential for censorship or manipulation.

What Are the Risks Associated with a “Single Point of Failure” in a Decentralized Oracle System?
What Is a “Chain Reorg” and How Do Checkpoints Prevent It?
What Are the Risks Associated with Relying on a Single Oracle?
How Does Wrapping a Token Introduce a Form of Centralization Risk?