What Are the Risks Associated with Holding a Large Percentage of a Protocol’s Governance Tokens?

Holding a large percentage of governance tokens carries the risk of regulatory scrutiny, as it may be viewed as a central point of control, potentially leading to a security classification for the token. Operationally, it exposes the holder to potential legal liability for protocol decisions and makes them a primary target for hackers or malicious proposals.

It also creates a high concentration risk in their investment portfolio.

How Can a DAO Structure Its Governance to Minimize the Legal Liability of Individual Token Holders?
What Is the Difference in Liability between a CEX and a DEX Developer?
What Are the Risks of a High Concentration of Staked Tokens in a PoS Network?
How Is Liability Distributed among Members in a DAO versus Shareholders in a Corporation?
How Do Decentralized Governance Tokens Incentivize Participation in Mint/burn Decisions?
Compare the Centralization Risks of Proof-of-Work Mining Pools versus Proof-of-Stake Validator Pools
What Is a ‘Governance Token’ and How Does Its Utility Affect Treasury Decisions?
Can Quadratic Voting Be Applied to Decisions beyond Funding, Such as Protocol Upgrades?

Glossar