Skip to main content

What Are the Risks Associated with Smart Contract Upgrades in a Community-Driven Derivatives Protocol?

Upgrades, even if community-approved, introduce the risk of coding errors or exploits in the new logic. The upgrade process itself can be a point of centralization if a small group holds the key to the implementation.

A flawed upgrade could lock funds, change contract terms unfairly, or introduce security vulnerabilities, jeopardizing the entire user base's assets.

What Is the Difference between a Community and a User Base?
How Are Upgrades or Fixes Implemented on an Immutable Smart Contract?
What Is “Smart Contract Risk” and How Is It Different from Traditional Counterparty Risk?
What Are the Technical Challenges of Creating Upgradeable Smart Contracts without Introducing Security Vulnerabilities?