What Happens to the Funds That Are Slashed from a Validator's Stake? ⎊ Path

What Happens to the Funds That Are Slashed from a Validator’s Stake?

The fate of slashed funds varies by protocol. In some systems, a portion of the slashed funds is awarded to the "whistleblower" ⎊ the block proposer who first reported the malicious activity.

The remaining, and often largest, portion of the slashed funds is typically burned, meaning it is permanently removed from the total supply of the cryptocurrency. This burning process benefits all token holders by making the remaining tokens more scarce.

In other protocols, the slashed funds might be sent to a community-governed treasury or development fund instead of being burned.

Is It Possible for a Validator to Be Slashed Accidentally Due to Technical Issues?

What Is the Concept of a ‘Burning Tax’ on Transactions?

What Are the Trade-Offs of Using Quadratic Voting for Proposal Funding versus Simple Majority Voting?

What Is the Difference between “Circulating Supply” and “Total Supply”?

How Does the Halving Compare to a Stock Split in Traditional Finance?

What Is the Difference between a Token’s “Circulating Supply” and Its “Total Supply”?

What Is the Incentive Structure for a Whistleblower in a PoS System?

How Does a Token Burn Mechanism Counteract the Effects of a Large Supply Release?