What Is a “Contentious Hard Fork” versus a “Planned Hard Fork”?

A planned hard fork is a scheduled, non-controversial upgrade where the community and developers are in agreement, ensuring a smooth transition. A contentious hard fork results from an irreconcilable governance dispute, leading to two competing chains and a community split.

The contentious fork carries high financial and network risk, while the planned fork is a routine technical update.

What Is an ‘Upgradeable’ Smart Contract and Why Is It Controversial in the Context of Immutability?
Why Is Full RBF Controversial among Some Cryptocurrency Users and Merchants?
What Are the Risks Associated with Smart Contract Upgrades in a Community-Driven Derivatives Protocol?
What Is the Concept of a “Soft Fork” versus a “Hard Fork” in Blockchain Upgrades?
What Is the ‘Longest Chain Rule’ and How Does It Resolve Conflicting Blocks?
Why Is ‘Payment for Order Flow’ (PFOF) a Controversial Topic in Relation to Price Improvement?
What Types of Disputes Are Most Suitable for On-Chain Resolution?
What Is the Difference between “Soft Forks” and “Hard Forks” in Blockchain Governance?

Glossar