What Is a Viable Alternative Valuation Model for a Purely Governance-Focused Token?

A viable alternative is to treat the governance token as a claim on the protocol's future revenue or treasury, valued using a sum-of-the-parts approach or a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. The DCF should model the expected future revenue that the governance token holders can direct or capture.

Another approach is to value the token as a "real option" on the protocol's future success, using an options pricing model to capture the value of the control rights.

What Are the Alternatives to Midpoint Matching in Dark Pools?
What Is the Difference between a Fee-Sharing Token and a Simple Utility Token in a DCF Context?
How Can a Perpetual Futures DEX Be Valued Using Protocol Revenue?
How Does a Token’s Utility or Governance Role Affect Its DCF Valuation?
What Are the Primary Alternatives to a CLOB for Trading Complex Derivatives?
What Valuation Model Is More Appropriate for a Native Token That Primarily Accrues Value through Stablecoin-Denominated Fees?
What Are the Primary Alternatives to Quadratic Voting for Fair DAO Governance?
What Is a ‘Governance Token’ and How Does Its Utility Affect Treasury Decisions?

Glossar