What Is the Computational Overhead Associated with Using MPC for Transaction Signing?

MPC-based transaction signing generally involves a higher computational overhead compared to a single-signature scheme. The process requires multiple rounds of cryptographic communication and computation between the parties holding the key shares.

While this overhead is often negligible in modern computing environments, it can introduce a slight increase in latency compared to a single, direct signature, which is a consideration for high-speed trading applications.

Does the Pull Mechanism Introduce Any Latency Compared to a Direct Transfer?
What Are the Computational Overhead and Transaction Cost Implications of Implementing ZKPs on a Public Blockchain?
What Is the Significance of Multi-Party Computation (MPC) in Institutional Crypto Custody?
What Is the Trade-off between Data Latency and Data Security in Oracle Design?
How Does MPC Address the Risk of ‘Insider Collusion’ in a Custodial Setup?
What Is a Multi-Party Computation (MPC) Wallet and How Does It Enhance Security?
How Do Multi-Party Computation (MPC) Solutions Enhance the Security of Institutional Crypto Custody?
How Does MPC Differ from Multi-Signature (Multi-Sig) Wallets?

Glossar