What Is the Difference between a 51% Attack on a PoW versus a PoS Blockchain?

In a Proof-of-Work (PoW) system, a 51% attack requires controlling the majority of the network's mining hash power, which is resource-intensive and requires significant capital expenditure on hardware and energy. In a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) system, a 51% attack requires controlling the majority of the staked tokens.

While both allow for transaction manipulation, the PoS attack is generally considered an "economic" attack where the attacker's own stake is at risk of being "slashed," providing a stronger economic disincentive.

Can a PoS Attacker Easily Acquire 51% of the Staked Tokens on a Large Network?
How Does the Energy Consumption of Proof-of-Work Compare to Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanisms?
How Does Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Differ from Proof-of-Work (PoW) in Resisting a 51% Attack?
What Is a “Long-Range Attack” and Is It Unique to PoS Systems?
How Does the Energy Consumption of PoW and PoS Compare in the Context of Economic Security?
How Does a 51% Attack Differ between PoW and PoS Systems?
What Is the Concept of “Nothing at Stake” and How Does PoS Attempt to Solve It?
How Does the Cost of a 51% Attack in PoS Scale Compared to the Cost in PoW?

Glossar