What Is the Difference between a Deflationary and an Inflationary Token Model?

An inflationary token model continuously increases the total token supply, often through staking rewards or mining, leading to dilution of existing holders unless demand outpaces supply. A deflationary model actively reduces the token supply, typically through token burns funded by protocol revenue, leading to increased scarcity.

Deflationary models are generally preferred for intrinsic value as they create a net positive value accrual for holders, assuming the burn rate is sustained.

How Does the Issuance Schedule of a Token Influence Its Long-Term Intrinsic Value?
How Does a Token Burn Mechanism Affect the DCF Calculation for a Utility Token?
How Does a Token Burn Mechanism Affect the Valuation of a Simple Utility Token?
What Is the Difference between a ‘Deflationary’ and an ‘Inflationary’ Token Model?
How Does a Deflationary Token Model Compare to an Inflationary One in Terms of Treasury Management?
How Does a Deflationary Token Model Attempt to Maintain or Increase Value?
How Can a Protocol Use Deflationary Mechanisms (Like Token Burns) to Counteract Inflation?
How Does EIP-1559 Relate to Ethereum’s Supply and Deflationary Mechanism?

Glossar