What Is the Difference between a Formal Verification and a Traditional Smart Contract Audit?

A traditional audit involves human auditors manually reviewing code and using automated tools to find known vulnerabilities and logic flaws. Formal verification is a mathematical process that proves or disproves the correctness of the contract's code against a formal specification of its intended behavior.

While an audit is a search for bugs, formal verification is a rigorous proof that the code satisfies specific properties under all possible execution paths. Formal verification offers a higher level of certainty for critical financial logic.

What Is Formal Verification in the Context of Smart Contract Security?
What Is ‘Formal Verification’ in Smart Contracts?
How Does the Concept of ‘Invariants’ Relate to the Security of Financial Smart Contracts?
What Is ‘Smart Contract Risk’ and How Is It Addressed?
Can Formal Verification Prove the Absence of All Security Vulnerabilities?
What Is ‘Smart Contract Risk’ and How Is It Audited?
How Is a Specification Written in a Formal Verification Language?
What Are the Main Limitations of a Traditional Manual Smart Contract Audit?

Glossar