What Is the Difference between the PPS and PPLNS Reward Systems in a Mining Pool?

Pay-Per-Share (PPS) offers a fixed payout for every share submitted, regardless of whether the pool finds a block. This shifts all variance risk from the miner to the pool operator.

Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares (PPLNS) pays out only when a block is found, and the reward is distributed based on the shares submitted in the last 'N' difficulty-adjusted shares. PPLNS is fairer over the long run but exposes miners to short-term variance.

How Does the PPLNS Method Distribute the Pool’s Luck Variance between the Operator and the Miners?
Why Is the Pool Fee Generally Higher for PPS Compared to PROP?
What Is the Difference between PPS and PPLNS Mining Pool Reward Systems?
How Does a Pool’s Luck Factor Influence the PPLNS Payout Model?
How Does PPLNS Effectively Deter Miners from “Pool Hopping” or Short-Term Mining?
What Is “Pool Variance” or “Luck” in the Context of Block Finding and How Does It Impact PROP?
How Do Pool Fee Structures like PPS and PPLNS Affect Miner Payouts?
What Is the Main Advantage of the PPS Method for a Miner Compared to a PPLNS Method?

Glossar