Skip to main content

What Is the Economic Rationale for Increasing the Cost of Additional Votes?

The rationale is to flatten the power curve and encourage broader participation, which is a key goal of decentralized governance. By making the marginal cost of voting higher for those who already have significant power, the system effectively subsidizes the influence of smaller holders.

This reduces the economic incentive for large holders to dominate all decisions and forces them to internalize the true cost of their influence, leading to more equitable outcomes.

How Do Options Contracts Relate to the Economic Incentives of Large Governance Token Holders?
What Is the Risk of Centralization within Ostensibly Decentralized DeFi Governance?
What Is the Mathematical Term for the Rate of Change of the Marginal Cost in This System?
How Does Quadratic Voting Mathematically Limit Whale Influence in Crypto Governance?