What Is the Main Drawback of Using Atomic Settlement for High-Frequency Trading?

The main drawback is the inherent latency and cost associated with on-chain transactions. Atomic settlement requires transactions to be confirmed on the blockchain, which can take seconds or minutes, making it too slow for the millisecond execution speeds required by high-frequency trading (HFT) strategies.

HFT typically relies on off-chain or layer-2 solutions for speed.

What Is Atomic Settlement and Why Is It Desirable for Crypto Derivatives?
What Are the Potential Consequences of Setting a TWAP Time Period That Is Too Short or Too Long?
What Technical Mechanism Enables Atomic Swaps on a Blockchain?
How Does the Use of High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Algorithms Relate to Front-Running Accusations?
How Does High Transaction Latency (Slow Block Times) Hinder Arbitrage Effectiveness?
How Does ‘Latency Arbitrage’ Affect the Execution Quality for non-HFT Traders?
What Is “Colocation” and How Does It Give HFT Firms an Advantage in Minimizing Their Own Slippage?
What Is the Risk of ‘Unwinding’ a Hedge Too Early or Too Late?

Glossar