Skip to main content

What Is the Primary Difference between PoW and PoS in Terms of Security Vulnerability?

Proof-of-Work (PoW) security relies on computational power (hashrate) and energy expenditure, making it vulnerable to 51% attacks via hashrate acquisition. Proof-of-Stake (PoS) security relies on economic stake (the amount of native coin held and locked up).

The PoS equivalent of a 51% attack is a "51% stake attack" or "Long-Range Attack," where an attacker needs to control a majority of the staked coins. PoS has a higher economic cost for a successful attack, as the attacker's stake can be "slashed" or destroyed, creating a stronger financial disincentive.

What Alternative Consensus Mechanisms, like Proof-of-Stake, Aim to Replace PoW?
What Are the Differences in Security Vulnerability between PoW and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanisms?
How Does a Proof of Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanism Differ from a Proof of Work (PoW) System?
How Does a ‘Margin Call’ in Derivatives Compare to the Security Mechanism of ‘Slashing’ in PoS?