Skip to main content

What Is the Primary Risk of Transaction Malleability in Smart Contracts?

The primary risk of transaction malleability, before SegWit, was its potential to break complex smart contract logic, especially those relying on the exact Transaction ID (TXID) of an unconfirmed transaction. If a contract's logic, such as a multi-signature escrow or a payment channel, used the TXID as a unique reference or a pre-signed input, an attacker could malleate the TXID, invalidating the pre-signed transactions or breaking the contract's state transition.

This could lead to a loss of funds or a deadlock in the contract.

Why Is SPV Less Suitable for Verifying the Full State of a Smart Contract Platform?
What Is ‘Transaction Malleability’?
How Did SegWit Resolve Transaction Malleability?
How Would a DEX Function Differently If It Relied Solely on “Push” (Direct Transfer) Transactions?